Medicare Cards Will No Longer Use Social Security Numbers

Medicare cards will no longer use Social Security numbers as required medicare cardsby a measure in the big Medicare bill signed by President Obama last week. Since its inception, Medicare has used beneficiaries’ Social Security numbers as a part of the Medicare claim number, which is displayed on the red, white and blue Medicare card.

Medicare has four years to implement this large change for new Medicare beneficiaries that sign up for Medicare. Medicare has four additional years to replace existing Medicare beneficiaries cards with a new randomly-generated Medicare claim number. This means that, according to the new bill, Medicare has eight years to fully implement this change.

This change is a result of the increasing incidence of identity theft and need to provide protection for beneficiaries’ Social Security numbers. Most other health insurance companies and programs have long since abandoned the practice of using Social Security numbers as the identifying marker on ID cards, including Medicare Advantage plans (privatized Medicare plans).

The change will, of course, be very costly to implement, and Congress has provided $320 million over four years to implement. This money will come from Medicare trust funds which are financed with payroll taxes and other beneficiary premiums.

Currently, over 4,500 people a day sign up for Medicare, and it is expected that 18 million more people are expected to qualify for Medicare in the next decade. Many new Medicare beneficiaries have been shocked, in today’s climate of identity theft, to find that their Social Security numbers are prominently displayed on their Medicare cards, so this will be a welcome change.

Secure Medicare Solutions client, Larry Williamson, said of the change, “I think it’s high time Medicare caught up with most other organizations that have ceased using Social Security numbers as ID numbers. Medicare cards are cards that you have to have in your wallet, and using the Social Security number just opens you up for the possibility of theft or abuse.”

The plan right now is for Medicare to begin using randomly-generated Medicare claim numbers, which will still be displayed on beneficiaries’ Medicare cards but will not provide the same vulnerability to hackers and thieves.

Garrett Ball owns Secure Medicare Solutions, which is an independent Medicare insurance agency. If you have questions about this change or want additional information, you can contact us here.

 

About Garrett Ball

"We discovered Garrett Ball online. Over the years he has saved us thousands of dollars in premiums for both Supplemental Part B and Part D drug policies with his cost comparisons and advice. He is uniquely prompt in responding to our e-mail inquiries and very professional in all areas. Highly recommended for all Medicare needs." - Ron T, IN
" I am so happy to review this company and Garrett Ball, the President. He has helped me through the confusing maze of Medicare, Supplements, and Advantage plans and the plans I am on now have been outstanding. Do not hesitate to contact Garrett Ball. You will not be disappointed. Response time is within 24 hrs., and always with thorough information to help his customers. Even when I have not contacted him for many months, he seems to remember and respond like it was yesterday. Great customer service seems to be hard to find these days, that is why I am so impressed with Secure Medicare Solutions. You will truly find a solution to any of your questions or problems." - Sandy W, SC/FL
SEE MORE TESTIMONIALS ABOUT GARRETT BALL

Comments

  1. Robert Hall says:

    The amount of money requested ($320 million) is ridiculous! Once the software to effect the change is finished (a minor change in card generation procedures), there should be no new charges for new cards (same cost as always). For replacement cards, what’s the hurry? Do a few thousand a day – cost: card material, mailing expenses, system time, and some manual labor. Where in the world does $320 million get spent?

Leave a Reply to Robert Hall Cancel reply

*